A Trenton Residents Action Coalition-sponsored Vehicle Accountability Ordinance apparently passed muster with City Council by a 6-0 vote at a recent meeting.
The ordinance seeks to place greater control on a vehicle fleet that is subject to constant abuse by Trenton officialdom.
Now, in non-bizarro world, such an event would mean the ordinance would head to Mayor Douglas H. Palmer’s desk for his signature and passage into law.
Unfortunately those legal geniuses over at 319 E. State Street have apparently told City Council that despite their affirmative vote on the measure, the ordinance is headed to the May 2010 ballot where Trenton’s voters will decide the issue.
While ordinance petitioners such as myself fully expected the measure to go to the ballot rather than be passed by our city officials (because it actually makes sense), the fact that it passed muster with City Council members was a positive note.
That positive note has been shattered, however, by City Hall’s legal shenanigans in claiming that this now-passed ordinance still must gain support from the city electorate.
I guess City Council’s vote no longer matters in this town, because in any other town, it does.
In fact, nowhere in state law is it provided that a petition-initiated ordinance must pass a double gauntlet of City Council consideration AND support from the voters. The Faulkner Act clearly states that an ordinance is only to go to the voters if it fails to be substantially adopted by the city’s governing body and executive.
So, if you happen to be among the 1,000-odd people who signed one of our petitions, next time you happen to be at City Hall, kindly ask the City Clerk, the City Attorney, or the “Special” Counsel to explain exactly where this ordinance has gone and why it must pass two hurdles instead of just one.
We deserve answers.